Tepezza Lawsuit
Tepezza, a treatment for Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), has been linked to serious side effects—most notably, irreversible hearing loss. Patients are coming forward with claims that the manufacturer did not sufficiently warn about the risk of permanent auditory damage. Consumers Injury Help is investigating these cases to support those affected in seeking justice and compensation. If you or someone you know experienced hearing problems after Tepezza treatment, you may be eligible for legal action. Reach out for a free case evaluation today.
- This is an Active Lawsuit
Introduction to Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuits
Tepezza, an FDA-approved drug prescribed for Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), is at the center of a growing wave of lawsuits due to serious allegations of permanent hearing loss linked to the treatment. Many patients have come forward with reports of severe auditory issues, including sensorineural hearing loss and persistent tinnitus, after receiving Tepezza infusions. These claims assert that Horizon Therapeutics, the manufacturer, failed to adequately warn the public and healthcare professionals about the medication’s potential to cause lasting hearing damage—even though early signs surfaced during clinical trials and post-market usage.
To manage the growing volume of claims, Tepezza lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Illinois. This legal structure enables a more efficient handling of shared discovery processes, medical records, and regulatory documents, allowing plaintiffs—either as part of a class action or through individual lawsuits—to seek justice for the damages suffered.
Attorneys across the country are now representing affected individuals, offering free consultations to evaluate claims related to Tepezza-induced hearing impairment. These efforts could ultimately influence how future drugs are tested, labeled, and monitored, reinforcing the importance of transparent communication and rigorous safety standards within the pharmaceutical industry.

Understanding Tepezza and Its Risks
Tepezza was developed to manage the symptoms of TED, including eye swelling, pain, and double vision. While the drug has shown effectiveness in managing these issues, a notable percentage of patients have reported unexpected and irreversible hearing complications. These adverse effects have led to hundreds of lawsuits asserting that Horizon Therapeutics did not adequately disclose the drug’s full risk profile.
Legal professionals are pursuing both individual and class action claims, arguing that more comprehensive safety warnings and longer-term studies could have prevented patient harm. As litigation moves forward, these cases are becoming a focal point in discussions about drug safety, informed consent, and post-approval accountability.
Need help filing a Topamax Claim?
Tepezza Hearing Loss: The Legal Basis for Claims
The core allegations in Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits focus on the drug’s link to serious and often permanent auditory damage. Plaintiffs allege that Horizon Therapeutics neglected to issue appropriate warnings despite being aware of hearing-related side effects in clinical studies and early real-world data. Legal teams are bringing forward product liability claims, asserting failure to warn, negligence, and design defects.
Law firms are also filing class action suits for patients who share similar injuries, allowing them to pursue collective compensation. These claims seek to hold the pharmaceutical company responsible for the pain, suffering, and financial burdens associated with hearing loss caused by Tepezza.
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) and Consolidated Cases
To streamline the handling of numerous lawsuits, the Tepezza hearing loss claims have been centralized in a federal MDL in the Northern District of Illinois. This legal mechanism unites similar cases under one judge for pretrial proceedings, helping to reduce redundancy in evidence collection and legal motions. The MDL also ensures consistent rulings on critical questions of fact and law, making it easier for plaintiffs to present their cases efficiently.
Class Action vs. Individual Lawsuits
Patients affected by Tepezza hearing damage may pursue legal remedies through class action suits or individual filings. Class actions are best suited for those with common injuries and circumstances, allowing them to share litigation resources and strengthen their claims through collective legal representation. Alternatively, patients with unique or severe complications may opt for an individual lawsuit to pursue damages that more accurately reflect their specific losses and treatment costs.
Tepezza lawyers are crucial in advising plaintiffs on the most strategic path forward, ensuring each case is pursued with thorough medical documentation, legal expertise, and a focus on long-term patient welfare.

The Role of FDA Oversight and Post-Approval Monitoring
Tepezza was granted FDA approval based on clinical trial data showing improvement in TED symptoms. However, real-world patient experiences have revealed complications that were not emphasized in pre-market studies. Post-approval surveillance, which involves collecting adverse event reports from healthcare providers and patients, is designed to identify such delayed or rare side effects.
The emergence of hearing-related complaints has sparked questions about the adequacy of the FDA’s oversight, and whether Horizon should have done more to communicate emerging risks. Many lawsuits argue that additional warnings—or even label changes—could have protected patients from harm.
The Involvement of Consumers Injury Help
Consumers Injury Help is dedicated to guiding individuals who have suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus due to Tepezza. By connecting patients with experienced attorneys specializing in pharmaceutical litigation, Consumers Injury Help ensures that claims are properly evaluated and filed within the legal deadlines.
Their role includes:
Coordinating free case reviews
Assisting patients with documentation of injuries
Referring clients to qualified lawyers handling Tepezza MDL and class actions
Supporting victims throughout the legal process
With Consumers Injury Help, affected individuals have an ally committed to securing rightful compensation and holding drug manufacturers accountable for their negligence.
Consequences of Tepezza-Induced Hearing Loss
Hearing loss isn’t just a medical condition—it can significantly disrupt daily life, personal relationships, employment, and emotional wellbeing. Many plaintiffs report difficulty communicating, social withdrawal, and reduced quality of life following their Tepezza treatments.
These personal hardships strengthen the case for compensation covering medical bills, ongoing therapy, assistive hearing devices, and emotional distress. Legal claims are not just about money—they’re about acknowledgment of harm and pushing for systemic changes in drug safety and transparency.
Steps to Filing a Tepezza Claim
If you or someone you know has experienced hearing damage after Tepezza treatment, here are key steps to take:
Get a Free Case Evaluation
Contact Consumers Injury Help to discuss your symptoms and treatment history.Document Your Injury
Gather medical records, audiologist reports, and any related documents that show your diagnosis and the timeline of hearing loss after starting Tepezza.File the Lawsuit
With the help of a skilled product liability attorney, formally submit your claim as part of the Tepezza MDL or through an individual lawsuit, depending on your circumstances.
What Lies Ahead for Tepezza Lawsuits
As new plaintiffs continue to come forward, the scope of the Tepezza litigation is expanding. Legal experts anticipate further regulatory reviews, potential label changes, and possibly large settlement negotiations. The outcomes of these cases may set important precedents for how pharmaceutical side effects are disclosed and handled in the future.
For affected individuals, participating in the MDL or a class action lawsuit is a vital opportunity not just for financial relief, but for ensuring long-term improvements in how drugs are developed, approved, and monitored.